Friday, March 28, 2008

am I not looking for a Mistress

A question put to me and i said no I am not. I find Mistresses and Masters or Doms have an opinion that they know what submissive's need. They call some submissives slaves, in my opinion this is wrong . Slaves have always been taken they did not submit to their will but forced to by conquest , sale or given by some one who had enslaved them. SO there is the first problem yes Virgina there is a difference in mind set and will. It could be a slave mind they are thinking about , but that to me is Africans that had no hope freedom nor enjoyment. Instead thousands of miles away from all that they knew. All they faced was doing what master wanted or punishment not where my head space is that to me is a doormat

Subs want to submit in my opinion they do not need anything to be taken they tend in my opinion to respect anything in leather and high boots.And that is fine it fulfills their needs. need honour, similar wishes and desired but most of all I need communication.

Next i am a switch I know both sides so I know when a Dominant is providing less then I would in a similar situation. I am very intolerant towards lazy dominants. Dominants must pay for their slaves some how part of the payment for a slave is activity At first the brat shows himself with lack of activity but later respect can be lost and the relations then deteriorates into unsatisfied partners. I have not really given up just If they do not live up to my needs I know I will not live up to theirs.

Now I play with a few Dominants when they have need of me but it is only play sessions, domination has to on my terns an in a fashion that I respond to. Otherwise instead of respectful slave you have one ready to revolt. So i would love to find a Mistress with an evil mind, the ability to enjoy what she is doing and the want to satisfied the needs of a slave. She must have a strong will and a great energy level , oh nails might be nice too!

Any one can try just remember i do bite.

1 comment:

morningstar said...

Your definition of slave .......
"Slaves have always been taken they did not submit to their will but forced to by conquest"

so .. do you propose that slaves today in the BDSM world be taken?? no by your leave.. no negotiations.. no contracts?? just taken???

i struggle to understand how you define yourself as slave - yet are picky over who you will serve.. and how you will serve.. and when .. and if........ that sounds more like your definition of sub.. and even then????? perhaps more just a "play" thing??

As you can tell i am still very unclear as to what you call yourself and how you define it.. words and actions sometimes show two different actualities...... don't you think??

morningstar (owned by Warren)